Orthodox Psychiatry has such a pitiful understanding of trauma that’s its still a wonder to me that they are even still around. Incompetence and just plain evil of that magnitude can only be kept around when it serves some rather nasty vested interests. The true natural process of responding to trauma has been understood and weaponised over the last few decades. It’s not that orthodox psychiatry “does not know any better”. It’s the case that there’s money and reputations to made by selling research to the military industrial complex. Once you have watched the video below and other material, ask yourself this. Why does Psychiatry have this obsession with locking people away in places where they can’t escape ? Could it be because they know that will initiate the Freeze Response and then that can be manipulated to produce another highly controlled citizen and more research for their disgusting task masters ?
This is one of those things that’s SO OBVIOUS that I actually find it frightening that I’ve heard no one talk about this before. The “he has a twitch” (remember Clint Eastwood’s twitching eye?) now has such an obvious explanation. Epilepsy. Is it really a “condition” that is treatable with drugs (like the supposed “Tourettes” shown in the video) or yet another coming-out-of-freeze-response-attempt after the result of some kind of trauma. The boy I saw having an “Epileptic fit” at school years ago when I was 11 or 12. I was really scared in that moment. But was I scared of the boy or my own animal-instinctual response which was telling me “what you are seeing is as a result of severe trauma in a trapped situation where freeze response was initiated but never successfully terminated”. When did this drift away from natural animal reactions occur ? After all we are animals. I don’t see humans as particularly special. Only “special” in so much as any life form is special as one of God’s creations. Yet so many seem to want to elevate themselves, and the human species, to a place that is somehow outside of reality, and nature. This is to our detriment. The symptoms are SERIOUS. The obvious gets missed and we lose ourselves down dead end paths that we kid ourselves are “advanced” and “technological”, evidenced by the worship of chemicals. Chemical science is just another form of technology but when the insights above are bought in (the video) we get a spectacular reminder of the limitations of technology. No one thinks computers are some total solution to world poverty. They can be a tool, just as some chemical medicines can be useful in the emergency ward when the risks of using them are worth it because a life is at stake. But that’s an extreme situation and the “chemical solutions” used outside of the emergency room are used to ABSURD proportions to the point where the real INTELLIGENCE, as depicted in the video above and the work of Peter A. Levine, PhD get’s missed.
I truly pray to GOD and OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF that more people are made aware of these developments because, I for one, are fed up of people being left in permanent suffering often to the point of death. It’s INHUMAN it’s UNNECESSARY and it must stop.
I decided to re-publish this article here as its the best I’ve found on the subject. Please note it is NOT my article and remains the property of “Edgy Truth”: https://www.facebook.com/edgytruth/about/
The reason I have posted it here is that this article was originally published on a site that no longer seems to be accessible, and is blocked by many services. I suppose at some time in the past their site may have been hacked, but considering the subject matter and the high quality of the article I found it suspicious that it is blocked. Even the archived version of it through the following link is blocked by some ISP’s, like my mobile phone provider for example.
Media contributions to mass shootings -Antidepressants often used by mass killers -Media ‘mental health’ disposition benefits pharmaceutical companies -Pharma’s advertising contribution to news agencies could influence disposition
A rise in mass shootings is something our generation has had to endure. The rise in mass shootings has left little in the way of understanding. We’ve never been able to reason out why anyone would commit such a heinous crime. Many of these shootings end with the shooter killing themselves and often times that proves to have been the initial strategy by the shooter.
But what causes someone to decide that their last response to their world of anxiety, depression and gloom is to take out as many innocent lives as possible, followed potentially by taking their own life? Many believe it is more than one factor contributing to these events. In Muschert (2007) Research in school shootings – Sociology Compass 1, you can find some wonderful reasonings which point out several variables. But I want to discuss two from a layman’s perspective.
The first factor which I believe contributes to mass shootings is media coverage. Assuming it is a contributing factor which inspires copy cat crimes, it delves into a murky, complicated area. The media has free speech, so who would we be to ask them to not cover the events? The fact is, people watch the news. People watching the news are voting on what content they appreciate most. And the fact is, mass / school shootings get a lot of votes.
Mass shooters likely know and understand that a mass shooting yields them some power in a world that they feel has stripped them of power. They want your attention, they want your powerlessness. It isn’t absurd to think that a challenged individual, whether it be mentally or otherwise, would consider this option due to its sought after coverage. Mass shooters cripple more than those shot, they cripple the nation, and sometimes the entire world, via the media’s over-sensationalism. Anders Breivik, the Norway shooter detailed inside the aforementioned linked story, was taking steroids. He was also taking ephedrine. He mixed those with caffeine. You don’t have to be a medical researcher to know that such a mix is a cocktail for personal destruction. But it is hardly mentioned in the news. The media wants to paint the picture of a crazy killer, probably because it sells more copies.
I’m not here to say Breivik wasn’t a “crazy killer.” I’m merely suggesting that what potentially made him a “crazy killer” was hidden in the shadows. Mind altering substances must have played some role, no? So why isn’t it talked about more? Patrick Purdy (1989 Cleveland school shooting) and Jeff Weise (2005 Red Lake high school shootings) were taking antidepressants (Prozac).
via antidepressantsfacts.com: His grandmother, Shelda Lussier, 54, said he saw a mental-health professional at Red Lake Hospital on Feb. 21, the same day his prescription was refilled for 60 milligrams a day of Prozac, which he had been taking since last summer, The Washington Post reported.
Studies have linked Prozac and similar antidepressants to a greater risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior in kids. In October, the Food and Drug Administration revised the drugs’ packaging to warn health professionals that they should closely monitor young patients when an antidepressant is prescribed or the dose is changed.
1998. 15 year old Kip Kinkel murders his parents and two of his classmates. He injured over two dozen more. He went on a shooting spree at his school. For one year prior, he’d been taking Prozac.
According to Hicks’s notes, Faith thought that Kip’s behavior had been better, but felt he had also become quite cynical. Dr. Hicks discussed the use of anti-depressants and recommended Kip try a course of treatment with Prozac. He wrote: “Kip reports eating is like a chore. He complains that food doesn’t taste good. He often feels bored and irritable. He feels tired upon awakening most mornings. He reports there is nothing to which he is looking forward. He denies suicidal ideation, intent or plan of action.” Hicks forwarded these notes to the Kinkel family physician with a recommendation that Kip be put on Prozac for depression. The physician concurred, and four days later Kip began taking 20 milligrams of Prozac per day.
The 2008 shooting in Finland by Matti Saari, whereas he shot and killed ten students on a college campus and then eventually himself.
via SavonSanomat.fi: Kauhajoki school killer Matti Saari ate depression with an SSRI drug that is not recommended for use in the United States under 18 years old.
SSRIs are widely used in Finland in adolescents.
The link is direct, clear and a justified topic of conversation. When someone assaults someone at a bar, we almost always ask, with immediacy, if drinking was involved. Why? Because it could be a factor in the behavior. Which begs the question: Why is it hardly ever a conversation? The media is the fuel to the fire. The aftermath of mass shootings is a slaughter of every possible headline known to man. It is the main attraction. But instead of discussing the link between pharmaceuticals and the mass shooters, the media covets the pharmaceutical companies as the solution?
Don’t think I’m right? One of the most pervasive lines in media after a mass shooting tragedy is “we need to have a discussion about mental health in this country.” Such a line implies that generalized, unaltered mental health is the fuel behind the tragedy. Hey, it may be, but let me ask some questions….
First, which came first, the delusions of death and murder and suicide, or the SSRI pill? Pharmaceutical companies will argue that the person taking the pill previously had an issue, so the argument that their pills are linked to these tragedies is pure fallacy.
Second, mass shootings, in what might be the most absurd case of spin ever, are now starting to act as marketing platforms for pharmaceuticals. When we say “we need to have a discussion about mental health in this country,” we are saying we need help with mental health. This country leans on pharmaceutical companies for that solution. SSRI’s are some of the most widely prescribed pills in the world.
So yes, it is highly possible that what helps fuel mass shootings is also quickly becoming what helps increase their sales. And that’s just insane. If media outlets can keep pushing the mental health spin, it will inevitably lead back to Big Pharma’s pockets. But allows us to go further down the rabbit hole. If Big Pharma can use the media’s “let’s have a discussion about mental health” push to increase sales, could they encourage the push? Check out what Robert F Kennedy Jr. said about Big Pharma’s relationships with news networks.
“I ate breakfast last week with the president of a network news division and he told me that during non-election years, 70% of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads. And if you go on TV any night and watch the network news, you’ll see they become just a vehicle for selling pharmaceuticals. He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account,” Kennedy said.
With that said, why would be be a far-fetched assumption to consider that Pharmaceutical companies are tragically encouraging the media’s spin on the coverage itself? I know this may not be a popular synopsis over a very delicate and sensitive arena (mass killings), but at this website, we simply have to consider the question.
How much research is even being done to discover any connections between antidepressants and mass killings? Or moreover, what kind of studies are being performed. Here’s one:
(via psychiatryonline.org) We chose a different strategy to examine this controversial topic. We reviewed all murder-suicides that took place in New York City from 1990 through 1998 using data collected from the files of New York City’s chief medical examiner. Blood from murderers who committed suicide is routinely tested for drugs, including antidepressants. There were 127 murder-suicides over the 9-year period. Three of the murderers (2.4%) were taking antidepressants according to results of toxicological testing. A 46-year-old woman who killed her son and then herself with injections of heroin was taking amitriptyline. A 48-year-old man who set fire to rags and paper in a closet and lay on his two young sons and his young daughter was taking amitriptyline. A 77-year-old man who killed his spouse and then himself with a gun was taking sertraline.
The findings in our study lend no support to the position that the use of SSRIs is associated with violence or suicide. The fact that only 2.4% of these persons were taking antidepressants at the time they killed family members and then themselves is less than one would expect in the general population, given that SSRIs were widely prescribed in the 1990s (5). These data do not support an association between the use of SSRIs and violence or suicide. There is no evidence suggesting that clinicians should hesitate in prescribing SSRIs, which have been shown to be safe and effective, for fear of violent and/or suicidal consequences.
Taking every simple murder / suicide is the core error in this study. No one is suggesting that a basic crime that’s been around for the ages wouldn’t support both sides of the matter, the suggestion is that the recent growth of mass killings is influenced by taking SSRI pills. That’s completely different. We are talking about killers who commonly seem disillusioned and paranoid for no good reason, going into a mall and shooting people without motive, later being found to have been taking SSRI’s. You can’t lump in heroin using parents killing their children, that’s vastly different.
My hope is that more people begin to see the connection between media spin and Pharmaceutical revenue. Between man and chemical.
Cyanocarbons are a chemical compounds that contain several cyanide groups. Such substances generally are classified as organic compounds, since they are formally derived from hydrocarbons by replacing one or more hydrogen atoms with a cyanide. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malononitrile
A cyanide is a chemical compound that contains the cyano group, -C≡N, which consists of a carbon atom triple-bonded to a nitrogen atom. Cyanides most commonly refer to salts of the anion CN−, which is isoelectronic with carbon monoxide and with molecular nitrogen. Most cyanides are highly toxic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanocarbon
The cyanide anion is an inhibitor of the enzyme cytochrome c oxidase (also known as aa3) in the fourth complex of the electron transport chain (found in the membrane of the mitochondria of eukaryotic cells). It attaches to the iron within this protein. The binding of cyanide to this cytochrome prevents transport of electrons from cytochrome c oxidase to oxygen. As a result, the electron transport chain is disrupted, meaning that the cell can no longer aerobically produce ATP for energy. Tissues that depend highly on aerobic respiration, such as the central nervous system and the heart, are particularly affected. This is an example of histotoxic hypoxia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide#Toxicity
LOW OXYGEN. This how Zyprexa really causes it’s damage.
It looks like I have been using Anaerobic (no or low oxygen) reactions in this low oxygen situation. This may be one reason for (a). A lot of pain and muscle cramping from Lactic Acid, and (b). Possible survival from pathogenic bacteria that could have taken advantage of my weakened state. For example some bacteria produce Lactic Acid in the Anaerobic reaction as a form of protection against pathogenic bacteria.
This is deep. Think of Assassins Creed. Even Dawn of War draws on some of this.
As I thought, The Roman Invasion of Britain has a lot to do with what we are dealing with as a country involving child abusers of all types and the use of abuse to mess people up by those “in power” who want to keep us down.
Yes that invasion took place 2000 years ago. But trauma from abuse has been passed on down the generations. The Romans already worshiped multiple Pagan Gods and carried out animal sacrifice and worse. That appeared to get much worse when the Romans met Ancient Greece.
“Barbarization sets in when, in an old culture… “the vapors of the magic and fantastic rise up again from the seething brew of passions to cloud the understanding … when the mythos supplants the logos.””Source.
Ancient Greece is the origin of all those peculiar hero myths and tragedies. When it combined with the Roman Imperial Cult of Mithraism we got the origins of Ritual Abuse and the basis for modern day elite cults. Just look at the symbols and images of Mithraism and it is replete with all the hallmarks of various “Satanic” images, especially “Baphomet” (see image above) ! I’ll cover that in more detail in a full article.
I remember seeing some kind of fantasy/scifi TV thing many years back that I’m still trying to track down. It could have been a Doctor Who episode. It was based in Roman Britain and depicted the Roman regional commanders as supernatural beings with terrifying powers. Of course they had no such powers, only strange cult practices and appalling cruelty. But whatever the episode was, it made a point I’ve seldom seen made elsewhere. The Roman’s were a very strange, very damaging culture. The effects they left have echoed down the centuries into todays world. The Mithra cults were not entirely destroyed but went underground to emerge as today’s elite cults. Bohemian Grove types. Ritual Abuse. The rich and powerful, not only following their corrupt practices, but messing up people to keep them down. The following article, that covers the field surrounding the Australian child abuse inquiry, makes the point very well (WARNING CONTAINS VERY EXPLICIT DESCRIPTIONS OF RITUAL ABUSE AT ONE POINT IN THE ARTICLE. THE AUTHOR DOES WARN THE READER BEFORE GOING INTO IT).
Some may question how much influence an invasion 2000 years ago can really have in modern Britain. But consider this. The Maya in Mexico, especially The Zapatista’s, have been struggling against a similar invasion by the Spanish 500 years ago. The Maya have been slandered before by being considered “wiped out” by that invasion. But, no, they’re still there. I’ve personally seen them in their brightly dyed clothing in Chiapas.
So what of Britain ? Well history is everything. CONTEXT is everything. The actions of psychopaths may ultimately be meaningless. But such serious aberrations don’t just drop out the sky one day. A leads to B leads to C. Once we have the reality of what we are really dealing with then solutions follow through.
One final point. Just look at the screen shot of Assassins Creed Unity at the top. Here is a major video game …
“The series has been well received by the public and critics, and has sold over 93 million copies as of June 2015, becoming Ubisoft’s best selling franchise …”Source.
Covering EXACTLY what Ritual Abuse, elite cult types and various types of child abusers, want kept secret ! Victims have been told “no one will believe you” yet there it is in a major video game. Some might say that its “just fiction” but I think fiction – especially video games – give people a space to face the reality of these things.
Constant crisis becomes “normality” in this society that is an everyday DISASTER (Rebecca Solnit) … created by Disaster Capitalism and Neoliberalism as the Pharma Companies/Psychiatry (for example) the modern versions of the Coal Barons (Mother Jones) enslaving us all.
This article is for victims/survivors of Ritual Abuse, as well as for researchers and practitioners.
In this blog I’ll cover how Ritual Abusers use trickery and lies to manipulate, often young children, into believing that the abusers have “powers” or are even “gods”. They create a lot of fear by referencing Religious myths that partly draws on what has turned into a pop culture of sayings in society about “The Devil” and “Satan” (Westerners language is often peppered with swear words involving “God” and/or “Hell”) that is based on highly inaccurate assumptions about the origins of these words and Religious concepts. This can create an atmosphere of veritable Middle Ages like superstition and Religious hysteria in RA victims, and the wider approach of society to RA itself, that seems strange in a modern world that claims to have rejected superstition. The hysteria is akin to things like Jerusalem Syndrome. By the way, many cases of the so called Jerusalem psychosis are likely to be genuine Religious ecstasy and possibly echo a healthy, if albeit strenuous, spiritual conversion away from being held in a lie, that can happen when waking up to the reality of Ritual Abuse.
I don’t mind revealing here that I have first hand experience of RA as a former victim. However therapists like Ellen Lactor and many others have uncovered the same mechanisms of control and they were not subjected personally to abuse.
I don’t bring in the Stargate series here for frivolous reasons or just for entertainment, although it is a very entertaining work of fiction. I think it can help victims and survivors to come to terms with the reality of what was done to them. If you are not familiar with this series then you might want to familiarise yourself with the series first. I’d also suggest that even if Science Fiction is “not your thing” then it’s well worth making an effort to watch these episodes or at least understand what the writers are doing in this series (especially in the first few seasons) as the writing and acting is a masterpiece of putting across a point that is at the heart of what the Ritual Abuse MO (“method of operation”) is. (The two parter is on sale here as individual episodes, or buy as box sets from Amazon or other retailer).
The Stargate series is also trustworthy. I have spent years watching it since around 2000. I became suspicious of it multiple times. That was typical post abuse, post Ritual Abuse behaviour, especially when much of it is designed to help people; victims are “programmed” (targeted traumatisation) to distrust anything that is genuinely helpful.
GO AWAY AND AT LEAST VIEW THE SG-1 SERIES UP TO THOSE TWO EPISODES BEFORE COMING BACK HERE OTHERWISE NONE OF THIS WILL MAKE SENSE. IF YOU STILL DON’T “GET IT” THEN KEEP WATCHING STARGATE SG-1. BY ACCIDENT OR DESIGN SG-1 IS *DESIGNED* TO FREE YOU !
So here we go !
Ritual Abusers seem to believe they are “punishing the wicked in God’s name” based on various convoluted pseudo-religious belief systems as I will show below.
Please note that this is Wikipedia and anyone can hit the edit button which is why I include links to the original version (“permanent link”) of the page that I quote from. Even though Wikipedia is mostly very good, some of it can be inaccurate. As long as the reader is aware of that you can check the references and come to your own conclusions.
“In the Hebrew Bible, Gehenna was initially where some of the kings of Judah sacrificed their children by fire [to Moloch]. Thereafter it was deemed to be cursed”.
This was a Canaanite death cult killing people in the name of Moloch.
“This valley is mentioned five times in the Book of Jeremiah (7:31,32 19:2,6 32:35) as the place in which the people would “burn their sons and daughters in the fire” as part of the worship of Moloch …”.
It was a “hell” alright ! But look at the definition above. The original translation is “hell” as “hidden”. So innocents were being killed under a cover of some kind, a conspiracy of silence like the one that often surrounds Ritual Abuse. If you read around the original theological meaning of this story, there is “punishment” of these child killing criminals, just as the (erroneous) definition of “hell” includes punishment of people. But the original perpetrators were not being punished as the damned in hell. They were being “punished” by good people at the time, by destroying their “shrines” and decrying their behaviour. Their shrines were destroyed to protect the innocent. These were children, human beings, who had committed no crime and hence did not deserve any kind of capital punishment, if anyone would do such a monstrous thing to a child. The literal meaning of the word “innocents”; “to be innocent of a crime”. The victims of the appalling practice, and the origin of the “hell” concept, were not “the damned being punished in hell”. They were victims of murdering criminals just as, sadly, many children are in our modern world.
I’m not the only one, as I found out, to make this comparison with the Caananites and Moloch. Elie Wiesel is an American Jewish writer, professor, political activist, Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor. In 2014 he published a newspaper advert in various newspapers that exposed the use of child sacrifice by Hamas. He’s not talking figuratively but literally, because he saw the same thing being done to Jews in the fires, “the ovens” of the NAZI concentration camps (a modern version of the Canaanite/Moloch “shrines” as I covered above); another death cult as the Caananites were as well. He makes the comparison to the Canaanite/Moloch history …
“Oh, wait. So you mean … ?!” – Major Samantha Carter of SG-1.
“Yes! So I am right aren’t I” – Daniel Jackson, Ph.D. of SG-1.
These appalling cults appear to have survived in some way, or their ideas have, and/or psychopaths were attracted to the history for their purposes of scaring victims and creating a smoke screen for their activities to this day. Hence the child abuse and kidnapping and killing of babies, drinking of blood and so forth that we see being reported by RA victims which takes place in a context intended to confuse victims, law enforcement, therapists and ultimately society itself.
At the core of these perpetrators MO is the use of this word “satan”. However in the original translation that word means ANYadversary, NOT some singular figure …
“Some religious groups teach that he originated as an angel,” …
SOME GROUPS. The actual original religious texts do not define “satan” in this way. The idea that “satan” is some supernatural entity is a purely CREATEDmyth, created out of a fiction by egomaniacs, psychopaths who lie to enslave victims in an idea … as depicted in the Stargate SG-1 episodes that I identified above, and the entire “Goa’uld” Stargate concept; these perpetraitors (sic) style themselves as “God’s” (or a supposed supernatural being supposedly called “satan”) to gain power over people. This is often done with children who do not have the experience set to realise that they are being manipulated.
What better evidence could there be here that the creators of Stargate already KNOW about this subject and some of them are people who had to break out of what other RA victims and survivors have been subjected to, or at least take reports from victims seriously ? What better evidence could there be than the episode “Bloodlines” (on Stargate Wiki) where Tealc (which means “strength”) has a vision of his poor son having this awful thing done to him; a Goa’uld snake being put into him, a fictional device obviously meant to represent RA Mind Control traumatisation.
Even the scene itself where Tealc bursts in and kills the “priest” about to do this, is of course purely ritualistic in its portrayal. A white tent at the edge of an area where the Goa’uld “outcasts” are sent contains a child about to be severely traumatised into the tyranny that Tealc and his fellow freedom fighters are freeing themselves from. In an act of love Tealc is faced with an agonising decision, a choice between allowing the corrupt “snake” to stabilise a sickness his son has (because in the fictional Stargate the Goa’uld worm can strengthen a humans immune system), or preventing the implantation in the name of freedom but having to watch his son die as a result. In a tremendous act of love he is willing to give his Goa’uld parasite to his son to save him and risk dying in the process. I won’t spoil the conclusion to this part of the episode here, I just bring this up because of the underground nature of the RA phenomenon. This is why the truth of it appears in a science fiction series and not the mainstream media.
“The original Hebrew term satan is a noun from a verb meaning primarily “to obstruct, oppose””
“The definite article ha- (English: “the”) is used to show that this is a title bestowed on a being, versus the name of a being. Thus, this being would be referred to as “the satan”.“
Ie. ANY person or situation that opposes.
“Psalm 109:6b “and let Satan stand at his right hand” (KJV) or “let *an accuser* stand at his right hand.””
Now look at a core Christian teaching story … and remember “satan” means any accuser such as someone who slanders someone and is then taken to court; they are the accuser of that person. In the following extract I have replaced the word “satan” with “an accuser” in each instance. See how it reads. You can compare with the original source of the quote (permanent link).
“Book of Job
At the beginning of the book, Job is a good person “who revered God and turned away from evil” (Job 1:1), and has therefore been rewarded by God. When the angels present themselves to God, [an accuser] comes as well. God informs [an accuser] about Job’s blameless, morally upright character. Between Job 1:9–10 and 2:4–5, [an accuser] points out that God has given Job everything that a man could want, so of course Job would be loyal to God; [an accuser] suggests that Job’s faith would collapse if all he has been given (even his health) were to be taken away from him. God therefore gives [an accuser] permission to test Job. In the end, Job remains faithful and righteous, and there is the implication that [an accuser] is shamed in his defeat.“
Remember its a story meant to teach. The God that I know anyway would not put someone through such suffering “just to make a point” as it were.
So to repeat. “satan” translates as “accuser”. Like an accuser accusing you of “being mentally ill” for example, or accusing Ted Gunderson of “being paranoid”.
“Pseudepigrapha (also anglicized as “pseudepigraph” or “pseudepigraphs”) are falsely-attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past.“
Hence NO SUPERNATURAL FIGURE a’la Stargate SG-1 and their fictionalisation of this issue into the false gods of the Ga’uald. This is what I think happens at Ritual Abuse ceremonies. Young children are scared into thinking that their abusers “are Gods” (or the supposedly supernatural being of “satan”) as a method of enslaving them into criminal activity. Some Ritual Abusers may even believe in some of their own nonsense, but psychopaths have been know to believe all sorts of odd things.
So there is no such thing as “Satanism”, per se, because it does not follow. It’s a non sequitur because the original Religious texts that apparently support the existence of “Hell” or “Satan” don’t exist or if they do they are regarded as untrustworthy.
Notice how this cult behaviour may include the worshipping of various figures like Moloch …
Remember the 60’s song ? … “I am the god of hell fire!” ? These misunderstandings of “Hell” have partly leaked into society (mostly in ways that are vastly less serious than what RA criminals get up to) so when someone says “it’s Hell” or “I’m in Hell” there is a tacit suggestion that they deserve the punishment, psychologically speaking. This is the kind of thing that is played upon by RA criminals.
There is also, as I covered above, a context here for Ritual Abuse in Fascism that has a very similar (some would argue identical with groups like the NAZI’s) modus operandi. There has been a modern day Canaanite group (Moloch) …
“Kurzweil believed the Canaanites replaced logos with mythos, producing a religious delusion“
Does that sound familiar ?
“The Young Hebrews are not the first to launch themselves into the task of mythic renewal. Their original contribution is rather stale. For over a hundred years, the world has pined for a return to the lap of myth. The escapes into various myths have hitherto inflicted disasters upon humanity.”
“…mythic renewal” … Fascism, Nazi’ism, Ritual Abuse, “Satanism” (but the “S” word really simply meaning “an accuser”, remember).
“For the moment, we shall content ourselves with this quotation from Huizinga: “Barbarization sets in when, in an old culture… “the vapors of the magic and fantastic rise up again from the seething brew of passions to cloud the understanding … when the mythos supplants the logos.”“
“In 1942, he spoke critically of his country’s German occupiers, comments that were consistent with his writings about Fascism in the 1930s. From then until his death in 1945, he was held in detention by the Nazis. He died in De Steeg in Gelderland, near Arnhem, just a few weeks before Nazi rule ended, and he lies buried in the graveyard of the Reformed Church at 6 Haarlemmerstraatweg in Oegstgeest.“
“As they say in the United States: “to be different is to be indecent.” The mass crushes beneath it everything that is different, everything that is excellent, individual, qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated. And it is clear, of course, that this “everybody” is not “everybody.” “Everybody” was normally the complex unity of the mass and the divergent, specialised minorities. Nowadays, “everybody” is the mass alone. Here we have the formidable fact of our times, described without any concealment of the brutality of its features.” (Chapter 1: The Coming of the Masses)
… and …
“The Fascist and Syndicalist species were characterized by the first appearance of a type of man who did not care to give reasons or even to be right, but who was simply resolved to impose his opinions. That was the novelty: the right not to be right, not to be reasonable: ‘the reason of unreason.‘” (Chapter 8: Why the Masses Intervene in Everything and Why They Always Intervene Violently)”
“the reason of unreason.” … Fascism, Ritual Abusers, psuedo-skeptics and all that is aligned against TRUTH … The truth that Ted Gunderson comes out with for example. Here we have one of the reasons that Ritual Abuse gets treated as a “moral panic” with no evidence supposedly existing for it. There was a person I was trying to talk to about all this who said “I don’t agree with what you are saying” and then abruptly ended the conversation because she could not REASONABLY include what I was saying. She did not understand that opinions and what we regard as “unchallengeable facts” are not set in stone. The idea that Ritual Abuse “does not exist” can change because opinions do change. The appalling fear that these RA criminals create for victims and society can change as well. But that change has been blocked up until now by a “seething brew of passions to cloud the understanding” created by RA criminals manipulation of victims and society by using the methods I have detailed above to scare and mislead people.
Creative media of various types has been created to help victims and survivors as well as practitioners. One example is the series Stargate SG-1.
The concept of Hell/Satan/The Devil is deeply flawed because accepted Religious texts do not define such concepts.
Ritual Abuse includes practices that have historically been associated with Death Cults like the Canaanites/Moloch.
The Method of Operation of Ritual Abusers includes concepts that, even if perpetrators and/or victims regard those concepts as real or not, is really there to act as a smoke screen to law enforcement and to victims/survivors/practitioners and wider society. This is done by a creating a semi-religious hysteria much like so called Jerusalem Syndrome.
RA criminals are not Gods or any supernatural figure, although perpetrators may want victims/survivors/practitioners and wider society to believe that.
It was SETI@Home that got me thinking about this. There’s certainly a huge space community, NASA, ESA, the International Space Station as well as various exploration missions. But all of them (that we know of) are within this Solar System, apart from Voyager.
Is lack of contact with intelligent civilisations “out there” because they aren’t there or because they are difficult to find and contact ? (UFO’s not withstanding). Or could there be a more influencing reason ? Has Earth become too introverted and isolationist ? There’s plenty of very good healthy activity that happens on the surface of this planet, but look at many of the very serious problems that are there. I don’t think I even have to name them here. They almost exclusively seem to be propagated by people who have totally lost the plot. Would opening up to a less introverted and isolationist view of ourselves in the Galaxy change that ? I think it would. All those problems would not suddenly go away, but I’d bet they’d soon dramatically reduce.
This seems to be a case of being truly receptive to being willing to be more extroverted on a Galactic level. The great mystery ? The Fermi Paradox ? Maybe lack of relationships with Galactic civilisations is because on some deep psychological level we have not really been seeking them. As so often happens in life a connection appears when its really needed or someone is ready TO SEE IT.